Islands, Parakeets and People: The conservation of Red-fronted Parakeets on Islands of the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand
|
|
|
When the first box was opened, a Red-fronted Parakeet flew again, calling loudly over the skies of Motuihe Island, after more than a century of absence. Another 14 parakeets soon joined, amidst smiles, tears and cheers from the public. It was a magical moment. A few days afterwards, another 16 parakeets were added, and the following year a final flock of 18 were released, bringing the total number of parakeets released to 49.
The establishment of Red-fronted Parakeets on Motuihe Island surpassed all our expectations. Not only are the birds seen regularly, but also the first evidence of nesting occurred within a year of the release! This news caused a lot of excitement among members of the Motuihe Island Trust and conservationists on other islands of the Hauraki Gulf, as we had anticipated that parakeets could fly to neighbouring sites and naturally recolonise them. An example of such a process occurred on Raoul Island, where parakeets returned after 150 years of being absent, following the eradication of rats and cats.
Last year, one day before my 32nd birthday, I joined Mike and Sharen Graham, from the Ornithological Society of New Zealand, to follow up on sightings of Red-fronted Parakeets on Motutapu, the closest island to Motuihe Island. Soon after our arrival on Motutapu, a family of parakeets greeted us, including a recently fledged chick, indicating that breeding had occurred on Motutapu. This finding was a great reward to the members of the Motutapu Trust who, like their neighbours on Motuihe Island, have worked long hours eradicating pests and weeds, with the hope of making the island a safe site for native birds.
We have learned many lessons throughout this project. A number of scientific papers have resulted from it, and hopefully will be useful for similar projects worldwide. But the success of this project is not only the result of its scientific planning; it is also the result of the enthusiastic participation of iwi, conservation volunteers, Massey University, the Department of Conservation and Auckland Regional Council staff.
This project has resulted in the establishment of another population of Red-fronted Parakeets and natural dispersal to a nearby site. It has also given me the opportunity to complete a PhD at Massey University, and even gave me the chance to learn some Maori! Now, whenever I am in the field, and a group of parakeets fly above me, I can say Nga kakariki ki te rangi – or ‘parakeets in the sky’.
|
Graham MF, Veitch CR, 2002. Changes in bird numbers on Tiritiri Matangi Island, New Zealand, over the period of rat eradication. In: Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive species (Veitch CR, Clout MN, eds); 120-123.
Greene TC, 2003. Breeding biology of Red-crowned Parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae novaezelandiae) on Little Barrier Island, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Notornis 50:83-99.
Ortiz-Catedral L, Brunton DH, 2009. Nesting sites and nesting success of reintroduced Red-crowned Parakeets (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae) on Tiritiri Matangi Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 36:1-10.
Ortiz-Catedral L, Ismar SMH, Baird K, Brunton DH, Hauber ME, 2009a. Recolonization of Raoul Island by Kermadec Red-crowned Parakeets Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae cyanurus after eradication of invasive predators, Kermadec Islands archipelago, New Zealand. Conservation Evidence 6:26-30.
Ortiz-Catedral L, Ismar SMH, Baird K, Ewen JG, Hauber ME, Brunton DH, 2009b. No evidence of Campylobacter, Salmonella or Yersinia in free-living populations of the Red-crowned Parakeet (Cyanoramphus novaezelandiae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 36:379-383.
Rimmer A, 2004. Tiritiri Matangi: a model of conservation. Auckland: Tandem Press.
Taylor RH, 1979. How the Macquarie Island parakeet became extinct. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 2:42-45.
Taylor RH, 1985. Status, habitat and conservation of Cyanoramphus parakeets in the New Zealand region. In: Conservation of island birds (Moors PJ, ed). Cambridge: International Council for Bird Preservation; 195-211.